Kemicha Law Firm

Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia covering warranties

Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia: Warranties, Indemnities and Closing Conditions

Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia: Warranties, Indemnities and Closing Conditions

Acquiring shares in a Tunisian company transfers ownership of the target without automatically removing its existing liabilities, contractual exposure or regulatory history. A Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia must therefore define the transferred shares, purchase price, seller disclosures, warranties, indemnities, conditions precedent and closing deliverables in a manner consistent with the target’s corporate records and the legal risks identified during the transaction.

What key terms govern the transfer of shares? 

A Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia, often referred to as an SPA, records the terms on which the seller transfers shares in a Tunisian company to the purchaser. Unlike an asset acquisition, the transaction generally preserves the legal identity of the target company, including its contracts, employees, licences, debts and potential liabilities.

The agreement commonly addresses:

  • the identity and ownership of the shares;
  • the purchase price and payment method;
  • signing and closing arrangements;
  • representations and warranties;
  • disclosed exceptions;
  • specific indemnities;
  • pre-closing obligations;
  • conditions precedent;
  • closing documents;
  • post-closing undertakings;
  • liability limitations;
  • governing law and dispute resolution.

The SPA operates alongside Tunisian company law, contract law, the articles of association and any shareholders’ agreement. Its drafting should also reflect the form of the target company, the applicable transfer restrictions and the corporate approvals required for the contemplated transaction. The Tunisian Commercial Companies Code remains the principal legislative framework governing companies, corporate bodies and shareholding rights.

Where the transaction forms part of a broader acquisition or restructuring, the agreement should remain consistent with the legal structure developed under corporate and mergers and acquisitions law in Tunisia.

How does due diligence shape a Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia?

The contractual protections contained in a Share Purchase Agreement should respond to the findings of the purchaser’s legal, tax, financial and operational review. Due diligence may identify transfer restrictions, incomplete corporate records, regulatory exposure, pending disputes, employment liabilities, change-of-control provisions or weaknesses in the target’s contractual arrangements.

A legal review may cover:

  • the target’s incorporation and corporate authority;
  • ownership of the shares;
  • shareholder registers and previous transfers;
  • articles of association and shareholders’ agreements;
  • board and shareholder approvals;
  • material commercial contracts;
  • financing documents and security interests;
  • employment arrangements;
  • tax exposure;
  • litigation and arbitration;
  • licences and sector-specific authorisations;
  • compliance and beneficial ownership information.

The legal review process is examined separately under Corporate Due Diligence, which covers ownership, governance, contracts, regulatory matters, financing and transaction risks. The published due diligence guidance also identifies representations, warranties, indemnities, conditions precedent and disclosure schedules as contractual mechanisms capable of reflecting the findings of the review.

Which seller warranties are typically required in a share sale? 

Warranties are contractual statements concerning the seller, the shares or the target company. In a Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia, they help allocate information risk between the parties and provide a contractual basis for a claim if an agreed statement proves inaccurate.

Seller warranties may cover legal ownership of the shares, authority to complete the transfer, the absence of undisclosed encumbrances and the validity of the parties’ corporate approvals. They may also address the accuracy of corporate records, share capital, financial statements, undisclosed debt, guarantees, material contracts, change-of-control provisions, intellectual property, employment, insurance, data protection, regulatory compliance, disputes and tax matters. Their scope should remain consistent with the documents reviewed, the disclosures made and the negotiated allocation of risk, while recognising that tax warranties and specific tax indemnities may produce different contractual effects. 

How should disclosure qualify warranties?

Warranties are usually read together with a disclosure process. The seller may identify facts or circumstances that qualify particular warranties, commonly through a disclosure letter or disclosure schedule.

Effective disclosure should be sufficiently specific to allow the purchaser to understand:

  • the nature of the disclosed issue;
  • the affected warranty;
  • the relevant documents;
  • the possible financial or legal consequence;
  • whether further action is required before closing.

A general reference to an entire data room may not provide the same clarity as a precise disclosure linked to an identified warranty. The required standard of disclosure should therefore be expressly negotiated.

The parties should also determine whether the purchaser can claim for a matter already known before signing or closing. This question should not be left to implication, particularly where due diligence has revealed a risk that remains unresolved.

How are seller liabilities limited under a Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia?

Sellers commonly seek contractual limits on claims arising from a Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia. These limitations should be negotiated in light of the transaction value, the identified risks and the category of obligation concerned.

Possible limitations include:

  • a minimum amount for individual claims;
  • an aggregate threshold before claims become recoverable;
  • a maximum financial cap;
  • different caps for different warranty categories;
  • time limits for bringing claims;
  • exclusion of indirect or remote losses;
  • prevention of double recovery;
  • credit for insurance proceeds;
  • purchaser mitigation duties;
  • specific procedures for third-party claims.

Fundamental warranties, tax matters, fraud-related conduct and specific indemnities may be treated differently from general business warranties. The agreement should avoid applying one undifferentiated limitation regime to every type of claim.

The parties should also define when a claim is considered properly notified. A notice clause may require reasonable details of the facts, estimated loss and contractual basis of the claim.

Which closing conditions apply to a Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia?

Signing and closing may occur simultaneously, but they are often separated when approvals or preparatory actions remain outstanding. A Share Purchase Agreement should state precisely which conditions must be satisfied or waived before the transfer is completed.

Corporate approvals

Closing may depend on:

  • seller board or shareholder approval;
  • purchaser corporate approval;
  • target company approval where legally or contractually required;
  • compliance with transfer restrictions;
  • waiver of pre-emption or similar rights;
  • amendments to corporate documents;
  • appointment or resignation of directors.

The required approvals depend on the target’s legal form, articles of association and contractual arrangements.

Regulatory and sector approvals

A share acquisition may require analysis of sector-specific licences, foreign investment rules, administrative approvals or notifications. An acquisition involving a regulated activity should not assume that closing is a purely corporate formality.

The review may also need to address competition issues where the transaction affects market structure or meets applicable regulatory criteria. Sector and investment approvals should be assessed before the parties make unconditional commitments.

The interaction between acquisition timing, ownership structure and administrative approvals is examined under Investment Authorizations Required in Tunisia. That guidance notes that an acquisition of shares in a Tunisian company may require review of corporate restrictions, beneficial ownership and sector-specific approval requirements.

How should disputes arising from a share acquisition be resolved? 

Disputes may arise over warranty breaches, indemnity claims, purchase-price adjustments, satisfaction of closing conditions or interpretation of disclosure.

A Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia should define:

  • the governing law;
  • the competent court or arbitral tribunal;
  • notice procedures;
  • escalation or negotiation steps;
  • expert determination for accounting matters;
  • interim relief;
  • confidentiality;
  • enforcement arrangements.

Where arbitration is selected, the clause should identify its scope and remain consistent with the transaction structure. Matters involving accounting calculations may be referred to an independent expert rather than a tribunal, while contractual or legal disputes may follow a different process.

Detailed drafting considerations are addressed under Commercial Arbitration Clauses for Tunisian Contracts. Commercial arbitration in Tunisia is governed by the Tunisian Arbitration Code, which regulates arbitration agreements, proceedings, awards and enforcement.

When a warranty or indemnity claim becomes contentious, the dispute may also require analysis under Commercial Litigation and Dispute Resolution.

Practical drafting priorities

A Share Purchase Agreement in Tunisia should be developed from the transaction structure and the evidence available, rather than from a generic template. Particular attention should be given to:

  • verifying legal ownership of the shares;
  • aligning the agreement with the articles of association;
  • connecting warranties to due diligence findings;
  • distinguishing general warranties from specific indemnities;
  • defining the disclosure standard;
  • identifying regulatory and third-party approvals;
  • drafting measurable closing conditions;
  • allocating responsibility for closing documents;
  • setting balanced liability limitations;
  • choosing an appropriate dispute-resolution mechanism.

The agreement should also remain consistent with financing documents, shareholders’ agreements, transitional service arrangements and any other contract executed as part of the acquisition.

Scroll to Top